Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
JMIR Ment Health ; 8(9): e28849, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1381345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, psychiatric hospitals all over the world had to adapt their services to the prevailing governmental regulations. As a consequence, home office use and telepsychiatry boomed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of home office use, its adoption, and the association of home office use with employees' mental health in a large psychiatric university hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: We obtained and analyzed home office implementation and use data from the psychiatric university hospital's information technology services. We also conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey to assess the employees' attitudes toward the clinic's crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Part of this web-based survey consisted of questions about home office use between March and June 2020, attitudes toward home office implementation, and mental health. Three mental health measures assessed depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-2), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-2), and stress factors (stress module of the PHQ-D); a cut-off score ≥3 was used for the PHQ-2 and GAD-2. RESULTS: Of the 200 participating employees, 69 reported that they had worked from home at least partially (34.5%). Home office use differed significantly across professional groups (χ162=72.72, P≤.001, n=200). Employees experienced neither depressive symptoms (mean 0.76, SD 1.14) nor anxiety (mean 0.70, SD 1.03). The employees reported minor psychosocial stressors (mean 2.83, SD 2.92). The number of reported stress factors varied significantly across groups with different levels of home office use (χ42=9.72, P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: In general, home office implementation appears to be feasible for large psychiatric hospitals, however, it is not equally feasible for all professional groups. Professional groups that require personal contact with patients and technical or manual tasks must work onsite. Further evaluation of home office use in psychiatric hospitals up to the development of clinics that function merely online will follow in future research. The situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic served as a stepping stone to promote home office use and should be used to improve employees' work-life balance, to save employers costs and foster other benefits.

2.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 44, 2021 02 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1105744

RESUMEN

The proportion of asymptomatic carriers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains elusive and the potential benefit of systematic screening during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic is controversial. We investigated the proportion of asymptomatic inpatients who were identified by systematic screening for SARS-CoV-2 upon hospital admission. Our analysis revealed that systematic screening of asymptomatic inpatients detects a low total number of SARS-CoV-2 infections (0.1%), questioning the cost-benefit ratio of this intervention. Even when the population-wide prevalence was low, the proportion of asymptomatic carriers remained stable, supporting the need for universal infection prevention and control strategies to avoid onward transmission by undetected SARS-CoV-2-carriers during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Prueba de COVID-19/economía , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suiza/epidemiología
3.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20271, 2020 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-176517

RESUMEN

The reproductive number in Switzerland was between 1.5 and 2 during the first third of March, and has consistently decreased to around 1. After the announcement of the latest strict measure on 20 March 2020, namely that gatherings of more than five people in public spaces are prohibited, the reproductive number dropped significantly below 1; the authors of this study estimate the reproductive number to be between 0.6 and 0.8 in the first third of April.


Asunto(s)
Número Básico de Reproducción , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Epidemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Suiza/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA